From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!SIERRA.STANFORD.EDU!Bryan
From: Bryan@SIERRA.STANFORD.EDU.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Contractual issues in Ada
Message-ID: <12291431269.24.BRYAN@Sierra.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Thu, 2-Apr-87 21:08:31 EST
Article-I.D.: Sierra.12291431269.24.BRYAN
Posted: Thu Apr  2 21:08:31 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 4-Apr-87 20:17:27 EST
References: <byrley@ntsc-74>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


I really liked Paul Byrley's message asking for help with the wording
of future RFPs.  It's very encouraging that an Ada customer has asked 
these forums (info-ada and ada-sw) for such help.  Now is the time for 
those in the DoD contracting community who have been yealing about s/w 
engineering and the lack of customer support to put-up or shut-up 
(put-up == give Paul a hand here!!!)

doug
-------