From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2ac371d0846c1167
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-10 14:56:39 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!MathWorks.Com!yeshua.marcam.com!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!olivea!decwrl!svc.portal.com!portal!cup.portal.com!R_Tim_Coslet
From: R_Tim_Coslet@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: 68040 Ada Compilers
Message-ID: <121985@cup.portal.com>
Date: Fri,  9 Sep 94 19:41:30 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
References: <conn.778848311@wuarchive.wustl.edu>
Date: 1994-09-09T19:41:30-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

The company I work for is planning on using Ada on a Motorola 68040
based machine in the near future and I was asked to post these questions
for them, as they don't have a news feed:

1) What companies have "the best" optimizing Ada compilers for the 68040?

2) How do the different 68040 compilers compare to each other?
   (e.g. ease of use, library structure, code quality...)

You can either reply directly by e-mail to:

	plant1.pcnet.net.com!ke4831@kaisere.com

Or post it or mail to me and I will collect and forward the replies.

					Thanks,
                                        R. Tim Coslet

Usenet: R_Tim_Coslet@cup.portal.com
        technology, n.  domesticated natural phenomena