From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,508516c114ade8e1 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Received: by 10.68.74.201 with SMTP id w9mr823434pbv.0.1328776495384; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:34:55 -0800 (PST) Path: wr5ni4221pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada without ada libraries? Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 09:34:45 +0100 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: <120f2efrm73fc$.mi1m9kwbbkes$.dlg@40tude.net> References: <82mx8tttx7.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: FbOMkhMtVLVmu7IwBnt1tw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: 2012-02-09T09:34:45+01:00 List-Id: On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 18:08:21 -0800 (PST), Shark8 wrote: > On Feb 8, 7:07�am, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" > wrote: >> On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:02:12 -0500, Stephen Leake wrote: >>> Patrick writes: >> >>>> Would this same approach seem logical for ada? -Patrick >> >>> Yes; "Anything C can do, Ada can do Better" >> >>> Lua should be used for user scripting, not large-scale programming. >> >> There is no scripting which should not be done in Ada. Even if it does not >> appear so at first glance, it is. > > HM -- That reminds me, I should re-try implementing a LISP interpreter > in Ada. No, the point is not to re-implement LISP, bash, perl, you name it, in Ada. The point is to throw it away. The advantage of using Ada is Ada itself. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de