From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,103c80d8c86cee54 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!tethys.csu.net!nntp.csufresno.edu!sn-xt-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "ME" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Concurrency in Ada Errata in word format not Post script format Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:09:50 -0800 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <11snkr4id13at75@corp.supernews.com> References: <11sm6cfebhs1a97@corp.supernews.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2503 Date: 2006-01-16T09:09:50-08:00 List-Id: The reason simply is to be able to read it so that I can get what I though that I had paid for. The index is in Postscript. It seems logical that if you make a blunder of that magnitude then you should post the correction in a widely readable format like plain text for gosh sakes! The main text Errata is in html ,which I already printed out, but the index is in Postscript. Go figure. "Larry Kilgallen" wrote in message news:qDbrWAHpVmj3@eisner.encompasserve.org... > In article <11sm6cfebhs1a97@corp.supernews.com>, "ME" > writes: >> Does anyone know of a Word format of Concurrency in Ada errata? I have >> been >> suffering with this book for years now. > > Is there reason to believe the authors of Concurrency in Ada would > choose word for their revisable format ? > > Is there reason to believe the authors of Concurrency in Ada would > release their work in revisable format ? > > There can be a very good reason for choosing Postscript.