From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b1a5713afb4e5c1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!news.germany.com!news.belwue.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: An easy way to simple scientific plots (in Ada)? Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <41bd2384-83a7-46ff-87e9-d726623633e9@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:10:54 +0100 Message-ID: <11krr3a27y407$.zt0a32up5ny$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Dec 2007 10:10:58 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: d6bc6a21.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=cF1<7MJBIN]1`E>oC;JXEZA9EHlD;3YcR4Fo<]lROoRQ4nDHegD_]RUdNFZbAQ[i2ZDNcfSJ;bb[UIRnRBaCd On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:07:29 -0800 (PST), JPWoodruff@gmail.com wrote: > I tried to follow Jeff's suggestion - installed fresh new gtkada2.8 > from adacore, then installed fresh Win_IO 3.0 from its source. For what it is worth, the latest available GtkAda is 2.10. BTW, GtkAda has its own plotting widgets in Gtk.Extra.Plot http://www.adacore.com/wp-content/files/auto_update/gtkada-docs/gtkada_rm/gtkada_rm/gtk-extra-plot.html When I tried it it worked. (Though I ended up with writing my own widget because I needed highlighting, filling under the curves and other specific feature, nevertheless). From what can see Win_IO uses the same widget. http://www.ctr.unican.es/win_io/ So there should be some version incompatibilities. Win_IO refers to GtkAda 2.4. I think you should ask the maintainers to review the code in order to make it compatible with 2.10. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de