From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.107.12.213 with SMTP id 82mr14941696iom.18.1455900855777;
        Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:54:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.182.125.195 with SMTP id ms3mr198489obb.17.1455900855756;
 Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:54:15 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!hb3no7156315igb.0!news-out.google.com!kr2ni996igb.0!nntp.google.com!ok5no3731174igc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:54:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <na7cni$drc$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=90.211.121.23;
 posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.211.121.23
References: <a04d93e9-31c1-4e2a-b21f-abd82b5123e3@googlegroups.com>
 <na6582$20u$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <66c5617d-49e6-40eb-9341-31c6664b1f6c@googlegroups.com>
 <na7cni$drc$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <11ca11eb-b9a1-46f2-afd2-75e320b89ff7@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: thick bindings, was Re: Vulkan is here!
From: Lucretia <laguest9000@googlemail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 16:54:15 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29550
Date: 2016-02-19T08:54:15-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, 19 February 2016 15:38:14 UTC, Alejandro R. Mosteo  wrote:
> On 19/02/16 14:07, Olivier Henley wrote:

> > 4. It is not THAT straightforward to make a pristine lower level thin binding as both Per Sandberg and Simon Wright have to exchange to clarify possible caveats.
> 
> And nowadays the thinnest of bindings should be even easier: 
> http://www.adacore.com/adaanswers/gems/gem-59/
> 
> Not pretty IME though, but can be a start.

If you've started reading the spec, you'll notice that creating a thick binding to Vulkan is going to be quite difficult due to the amount of locking involved. 

I intend to create a simple thin binding and then build of that after some experimentation.