From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc1361a952ec75ca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,582dff0b3f065a52 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-17 09:40:29 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: ian0kerr@my-deja.com (Ian) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: How Ada could have prevented the Red Code distributed denial of service attack. Date: 17 Aug 2001 09:40:29 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <11bf7180.0108170840.2e7b2645@posting.google.com> References: <9kp9n7$ivm$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3B73337F.862F8D93@home.com> <9lb7hu$72h$1@norfair.nerim.net> <3B7C6977.3648F061@home.com> <3B7C79FA.89E62321@globetrotter.qc.ca> <3B7C9288.6CD8C288@home.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.133.99.210 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 998066429 31053 127.0.0.1 (17 Aug 2001 16:40:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Aug 2001 16:40:29 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12055 comp.lang.c++:83445 Date: 2001-08-17T16:40:29+00:00 List-Id: kaz@ashi.footprints.net (Kaz Kylheku) wrote in message news:... > > The C++ language is no defined by a yacc grammar. > Did you say that it is noW defined or noT defined? Does any one have a formal definition of the C++ language definition in some formal language? That is for C++ (ISO 14882:1998) or for something that is close. I would find that very useful. Thanks, Ian