From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a0be06fbc0dd71f1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!213.200.89.82.MISMATCH!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!news.tiscali.de!news.belwue.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: The future of Ada is at risk From: Georg Bauhaus In-Reply-To: <878x3436pj.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> References: <20071229040639.f753f982.coolzone@it.dk> <878x3436pj.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1199531506.9355.8.camel@K72> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:11:46 +0100 Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 05 Jan 2008 12:11:48 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: a31f1168.newsspool1.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=TnIc=@k6NU1NTD55K=ic==]BZ:af>4Fo<]lROoR1Fl8W>\BH3Y2PWTa_DZbRh>A:ho7QcPOV3C@@Bb\Ed]7:Ni45h1g=S57 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19209 Date: 2008-01-05T12:11:48+01:00 List-Id: On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 11:30 +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Michael Bode writes: > > Rico Secada writes: > > > > > > [...] > > > > 4. As long as you have to choose either program GPL code or pay like > > you're Boeing there are quite a few developers for which Ada is no > > option at all. They will buy Visual Studio or Delphi for at most a few > > hundred $/=E2=82=AC or download j2sdk or Python for nothing and start c= oding. >=20 > That's not true. You've been on this forum for quite some time now > and I am very surprised you still seem ignorant of Janus/Ada (295 USD > for Windows, with Claw); see > http://www.rrsoftware.com/html/companyinf/prices.htm). >=20 For those who have to write portable DB software, and who for some reason must not disclose their software, GNADE is not really an option because it is effectively written in what might be called the GNAT language. It also uses 64bit types. Therefore, GNADE cannot be used without changes with other Ada compilers. In this scenario, the GMGPL turns into the GPL. No offence intended, I'm glad there is something up to date for database programming, and there is no problem when=20 source delivery is an option.