From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,23c85e456e18d6b5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed01.chello.at!newsfeed02.chello.at!news.hispeed.ch.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <1197572.sQlijkcsCu@linux1.krischik.com> From: Martin Krischik Subject: Re: The Computer Language Shootout Benchmarks Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 20:15:18 +0200 References: <1262902.DI8C0e8O9o@linux1.krischik.com> <1146595198.437109.277820@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com> <1706825.Rr4F3nhIbP@linux1.krischik.com> <5221419.vt3xd4rotE@linux1.krischik.com> <6q1m52h8kv8ehafq3tbhc5l2r63m48un0v@4ax.com> User-Agent: KNode/0.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@hispeed.ch Organization: hispeed.ch NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.218.119.160 (80.218.119.160) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 08:00:03 +0200 X-Trace: 49ca8445c3b63f57fd20509750 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4107 Date: 2006-05-05T20:15:18+02:00 List-Id: Craig Carey wrote: > On Thu, 04 May 2006 18:48:04 +0200, Martin Krischik wrote: >>Martin Krischik wrote: > ... >>> Also C cheats: > > In another sub-thread of this thread I noted that the teste tresults of > the website you keep steadily promoting, I am not promoting them. I just hope to get good result for Ada. Please note that a test not provided or failing gives worse result in the overall result set. Besides it's fun. > could be fraudulent > throughtout and uncompromisingly secretively adjusted by 53% to favour > your favourite OS, > > The C coder-community falsifications of findings seem to be big. > > But there is a plan here.... Well, I found out today: The test date they provide are significantly smaller then the test date they are actually going to us. And to my dismay: with a full dataset the result look not so promising. Current results on an AMD 64: ++ ./knucleotide real 0m1.654s user 0m1.352s sys 0m0.096s ++ ./KNucleotide_1 real 0m2.508s user 0m2.268s sys 0m0.120s ++ ./KNucleotide_2 real 0m2.466s user 0m2.200s sys 0m0.148s ++ popd >>First is gcc c - as I have not got the same setup as the shootout > > Oh, so you have not been falsifying data in e-mails to comp.lang.ada > yet ?. What could be worse about GNAT than slow speeds ...? Of corse not. Why should I? Martin Martin -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com