From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,62a76f7157243e61
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Jerry <lanceboyle@qwest.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is it Ada 2005 or Ada 2007?
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:55:11 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1194213311.444949.278220@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
References: <1193782578.950217.150590@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
   <1193872753.943387.212600@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
   <fgkcmf$5q5$1@ikaria.belnet.be>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.171.118.172
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1194213311 6883 127.0.0.1 (4 Nov 2007 21:55:11
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 21:55:11 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <fgkcmf$5q5$1@ikaria.belnet.be>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X;
 en-US) AppleWebKit/522+ (KHTML, like Gecko,
 Safari/522) OmniWeb/v613.0.93354,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.171.118.172;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18182
Date: 2007-11-04T13:55:11-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Nov 4, 5:07 am, d...@cs.kuleuven.ac.be (Dirk Craeynest) wrote:
> Jerry  <lancebo...@qwest.net> wrote:
> >On Oct 30, 3:16 pm, Jerry <lancebo...@qwest.net> wrote:
> >> I have seen the "new" Ada referred to as both Ada 2005 and Ada 2007.
> [...]
> >> Is there an official designation or
> >> are left to our own devices to call it what we want?
>
> >Thanks for your comments. On balance, things seem as confused as I had
> >feared.
>
> This issue is very clear, but some postings here seem to be confused.
>
> The internationally accepted recommendation to refer to the latest
> Ada language definition is to use the informal name "Ada 2005".
>
> See <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/msg/f1cf1036a71fca56>
>
> Dirk Craeynest, Dirk.Craeyn...@cs.kuleuven.be
> ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG9, Head of Delegation, Belgium

Thanks, Dirk. 2005 it is.
Jerry