From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6b3ebf057333800c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Largest size array in Gnat 2005 for the PC?
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
In-Reply-To: <1193780421.3259.46.camel@kartoffel>
References: <13idb3jbm28kfbe@corp.supernews.com>
	 <1193737660.539205.271270@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
	 <1193772402.13888.130.camel@kartoffel>
	 <1193775877.289991.52560@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
	 <1193780421.3259.46.camel@kartoffel>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1193781019.3259.48.camel@kartoffel>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:50:19 +0100
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Oct 2007 22:49:35 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 6a1b4c3c.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=nJC=I];lY=eJ00P1S40fZgA9EHlD;3Ycb4Fo<]lROoRa4nDHegD_]Re_`Y6g1[KJ^cN[W<lHX`=Bd\6BhD5G6\il;JSo1HN^3_a
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2659
Date: 2007-10-30T22:49:35+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 22:40 +0100, Georg Bauhaus wrote:

> Ah, yes. Could exceeding size have produced the -1 in
>  -1(%ebp,%eax), %eax
> too? It is
>  -10002(%ebp,%eax), %eax
> for the "normal size" array of 10_000 elements?
                                               s.