From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,75c440b4b7ed5f91
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Real Time IO routines
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:47:24 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1193752044.984226.15200@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
References: <1193410739.367181.96050@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
   <87hckbeajm.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
   <Txldn5aszJju@eisner.encompasserve.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.58.34.227
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1193752045 608 127.0.0.1 (30 Oct 2007 13:47:25
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:47:25 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <Txldn5aszJju@eisner.encompasserve.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 SEVPXS01
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=32.58.34.227;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2637
Date: 2007-10-30T06:47:24-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Simon Clubley wrote:
> Ludovic Brenta <ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org> writes:
> > At Barco avionics, our coding standard prohibits functions that return
> > unconstrained types because they use the secondary stack, making
> > inspection of object code more difficult.  That prohibition applies to
> > 'Image, too.  But outside of safety-critical software, I see no reason
> > why 'Image should be prohibited.
>
> Is your coding standard freely available by any chance ?
>
> I'd be interested in seeing what other Ada features are not allowed in
> your code as well as what other recommendations that your standard
> might make.

No, it's not. It is proprietary due to corporate policy.

--
Ludovic Brenta.