From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,75c440b4b7ed5f91 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.arglkargh.de!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Real Time IO routines -- answering Simon Wright part 1 From: Georg Bauhaus In-Reply-To: <1193693060.13888.62.camel@kartoffel> References: <1193410739.367181.96050@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1193693060.13888.62.camel@kartoffel> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1193693497.13888.69.camel@kartoffel> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:31:37 +0100 Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Oct 2007 22:30:55 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 39d88ced.newsspool3.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=J On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 22:24 +0100, Georg Bauhaus wrote: More clearly, the following paragraph was meant to show why a simple output of string values is just as good or bad as a simple output of S'Image(V). So when there is nothing wrong with simple output of, e.g., plain vanilla text strings, why is there something wrong with simple output of non-text values? > For example, tabulation may require narrowing to columns, > paragraphs might have to be shaped, words truncated etc.. > The circumstances are similar to those requiring numbers > with Aft, say.