From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,75c440b4b7ed5f91 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: John McCormick Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Real Time IO routines Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 05:40:31 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1193488831.655432.315370@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> References: <1193410739.367181.96050@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1193416987.425545.80810@v29g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <1193417619.216687.95600@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1193418278.033289.106280@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <1193419270.872928.86840@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <873avxg1uv.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <1193428813.533744.163870@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <16o6lua8t1589.7jh7lsdh2d8i$.dlg@40tude.net> <1193433267.671789.134690@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.212.104.239 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1193488831 28548 127.0.0.1 (27 Oct 2007 12:40:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:40:31 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1193433267.671789.134690@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.212.104.239; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2606 Date: 2007-10-27T05:40:31-07:00 List-Id: On Oct 26, 4:14 pm, andrew wrote: > > > start := clock; > --I run my algorithm here > finish := clock; > ada.Text_IO.put_line("time = " & duration'image(to_duration(finish - > start))); > > the output is always time = 0.000000000. I know it had to take some > time because it takes about 10 seconds for the program to reach that > point in the code. Overflow maybe? For years I used the identical logic in an exercise in plotting running times for various sorting algortihms in a unit on Big-O. It worked fine for the old GNAT (Ada 95). Last year when I recompiled it with GNAT GPL, I got the same results as you - all times gave zero. When I added a delay 10.0, it worked as Adam reported. I meant to submit a bug report, but never got around to writing it up. I haven't tried it with the latest GPL version. John