From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,470860aa3e635a7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Maciej Sobczak Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT for MS Visual Studio Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 14:48:27 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1191793707.951456.242890@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> References: <4xsl4zw3bp.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <1191357491.860178.230380@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <4702ADCC.7080209@obry.net> <1191439439.120567.172630@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <4703F02D.3030207@obry.net> <1191682021.844225.236870@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <4707A3D0.3070702@obry.net> <47088904.1090201@obry.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.3.103.41 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1191793708 15292 127.0.0.1 (7 Oct 2007 21:48:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 21:48:28 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <47088904.1090201@obry.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.3.103.41; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2341 Date: 2007-10-07T14:48:27-07:00 List-Id: On 7 Pa , 09:21, Pascal Obry wrote: > The recurrent saying "if you don't like this, do it yourself" in > comp.lang.ada is just a big mistake for Ada as a whole. Yes. Especially when it's intermixed with claims that Ada allows to finish the project earlier when compared to "other" languages. Sorry, but reinventing every wheel have *never* made any project faster. Not only because it's just directly more work - there is also indirectly more work with all the new bugs that get introduced on the way. Implement my own container? Is this what high-level programming is about? Sorry, I had to say that. > Now maybe some operations could be made safe, like those not using > cursors. For example, in Ada.Containers.Vectors: > > function Element > (Container : Vector; > Index : Index_Type) return Element_Type; > > Why this could not be made safe ? I believe it could. -- Maciej Sobczak * www.msobczak.com * www.inspirel.com