From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,55f6e230b02eff2f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Matthew Heaney <mheaney@on2.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Containers - nontrivial element access
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:55:16 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1191452116.954882.81590@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
References: <1191275759.184463.238350@n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <1191343071.685478.146710@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
   <1191358939.031798.177670@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
   <1191363628.908691.313970@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
   <1191441598.702440.314410@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.162.65.129
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1191452117 8269 127.0.0.1 (3 Oct 2007 22:55:17
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:55:17 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1191441598.702440.314410@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.162.65.129;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2282
Date: 2007-10-03T15:55:16-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Oct 3, 3:59 pm, Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homep...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Your solution requires some dose of liberal thinking,

But my solution works!  You are free to criticize it, but you have
nothing to compare it to (at least none that I've seen, or can even
think of).


> which I'm not
> easily willing to accept in the language that boasts high-integrity
> mindset. ;-)

Oh dear, I hope you haven't seen my latest Ada gem:

http://www.adacore.com/2007/09/17/ada-gem-9/

Up-level references galore!