From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,23f57930ddc13e1c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: roderick.chapman@googlemail.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Missing Index Value in Array Aggregate Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:01:45 -0000 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1191430905.614175.11750@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> References: <1i50iqb.14r2zb11w8eyc2N%csampson@inetworld.net> <1190822071.488118.316450@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> <1i548co.yz2f6m45x0mwN%csampson@inetworld.net> <1190975217.781850.216560@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <46FD2A20.8090509@obry.net> <1191011215.892759.221190@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.196.219.130 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1191430905 32338 127.0.0.1 (3 Oct 2007 17:01:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:01:45 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1191011215.892759.221190@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070809 Camino/1.5.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com; posting-host=90.196.219.130; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2266 Date: 2007-10-03T17:01:45+00:00 List-Id: On Sep 28, 9:26 pm, Maciej Sobczak wrote: > -fstack-check -gnata -gnatf -gnato -gnatv -gnatVa -gnatwa -gnatwd - > gnatwe -gnatwh -gnatwl -gnatwt -gnatwH -gnaty3aAbcdefhiklM120nprtux We regularly compile the SPARK tools with -gnato -gnatwa -gnatwe -gnatVa -fstack-check here for internal testing purposes. Unsurprisingly, it works fine. > Who can beat this? ;-) The SPARK Toolset! SPARK, just for starters, statically eliminates all possibility of erroneous execution - I don't know of any compiler that can do that... :-) - Rod, SPARK Team