From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbcfe2b0a74da57e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Maciej Sobczak Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Inherited Methods and such Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:44:32 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1191012272.457766.273330@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> References: <1190296353.624737.150940@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> <11m13st1f92kf$.m8s6y8mc8ebk.dlg@40tude.net> <1190321119.206313.65290@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1190408526.100291.265040@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <9ukf2wtqjs0q$.iuijmal4x56b$.dlg@40tude.net> <1190497995.498679.119190@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <1mw3qju08q8uj.sgzht7ld9ydc$.dlg@40tude.net> <1190579805.451187.71140@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1i8ksr774bjbj.vpmnx3c0i9qz.dlg@40tude.net> <1190646125.024072.310020@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <1r9s9v6pcjifl.vp4ktk0unpd1.dlg@40tude.net> <1190753631.240548.101820@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <1190843408.713838.128690@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.3.107.199 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1191012272 5550 127.0.0.1 (28 Sep 2007 20:44:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:44:32 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.3.107.199; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2206 Date: 2007-09-28T13:44:32-07:00 List-Id: On 28 Wrz, 21:42, Robert A Duff wrote: > Here's an example. What do you think? Perfect! I wasn't aware of the possibility to use return to achieve this "progressive" construction process. I knew this form of return, but not the gory details of how tags are assigned. > Do you revise your opinion that > Ada doesn't properly support constructors? Yes, this example is convincing. How would you recommend using this pattern with controlled types? I might need controlled for the finalization part - do you recommend ignoring the Initialize operation in this case? -- Maciej Sobczak http://www.msobczak.com/