From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,23f57930ddc13e1c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Missing Index Value in Array Aggregate
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:26:55 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1191011215.892759.221190@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
References: <1i50iqb.14r2zb11w8eyc2N%csampson@inetworld.net>
   <1190822071.488118.316450@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>
   <fdeq3j$91r$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
   <1i548co.yz2f6m45x0mwN%csampson@inetworld.net>
   <utzpfds14.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
   <1190975217.781850.216560@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
   <46FD2A20.8090509@obry.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.3.107.199
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1191011216 1762 127.0.0.1 (28 Sep 2007 20:26:56
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:26:56 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <46FD2A20.8090509@obry.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US;
 rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.3.107.199;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2204
Date: 2007-09-28T13:26:55-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 28 Wrz, 18:21, Pascal Obry <pas...@obry.net> wrote:

> > Same here, and in addition I always compile with -gnatwa (enable all
> > optional warnings).
>
> Same here and adding -gnatwe to fail when a single warning is issued by
> the compiler.

Only these two? :-)

-fstack-check -gnata -gnatf -gnato -gnatv -gnatVa -gnatwa -gnatwd -
gnatwe -gnatwh -gnatwl -gnatwt -gnatwH -gnaty3aAbcdefhiklM120nprtux

Who can beat this? ;-)

Seriously - I find it helpful to use all these options together. The
initial impression is that the compiler is too picky, but after
fighting the code through all this it just reads like a prose.

--
Maciej Sobczak
http://www.msobczak.com/