From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ec90d7920bdc8e8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Tomek Wa kuski <tomek.walkuski@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada and licensing
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:37:18 -0000
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1190021838.110522.147220@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
References: <1190014387.975202.55530@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
   <ulkb5ej5v.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.26.88.76
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1190021838 5630 127.0.0.1 (17 Sep 2007 09:37:18
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:37:18 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <ulkb5ej5v.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl;
 rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070801 Firefox/2.0.0.6,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.26.88.76;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:1971
Date: 2007-09-17T09:37:18+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Wikipedia says:

""Any software created with GPL tools must be released under the GPL."
    The program must be GPL only if it includes GPL source code or it
is linked with a GPL library. For example, using gcc to compile
proprietary software is allowed."

Wikipedia made a mistake? GCC is licensed as GPL, GNAT is also GPL -
so where is the difference?