From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b672743914db49f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Tomek Wa kuski <tomek.walkuski@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: "Ada Gems": Constructor functions
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:39:31 -0000
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1189582771.755063.63050@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
References: <1189015827.384331.17490@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
   <uJVDi.498536$p47.245936@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
   <1189161491.346922.174530@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
   <wcclkbi5wu9.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
   <1189275647.196090.47920@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
   <1189431964.575522.250700@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
   <46e647af$0$30379$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
   <1189546433.646201.242950@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.26.87.51
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1189582781 5173 127.0.0.1 (12 Sep 2007 07:39:41
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:39:41 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1189546433.646201.242950@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl;
 rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070801 Firefox/2.0.0.6,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.26.87.51;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:1901
Date: 2007-09-12T07:39:31+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 11 Wrz, 23:33, Anh Vo <anhvofrc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One interesting observation, if the return statement is
> qualified as shown below, it is compiled on Windows, too.
>
>   return Object'(Name => To_Unbounded_String (Name));
>
This compiles on Windows and also on Gentoo box with gnat-
gpl-4.1.3.2007 (which is in fact GNAT GPL 2007 from AdaCore).

This also works:

return New_Object : Object do
    New_Object.Name := To_Unbounded_String (Name);
end return;

Mystery solved? :) So... bug must persist in Ada Gems article :)

Tomek