From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ebdc5ed511896a0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: shoshanister@gmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: urgent question - generics
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 04:06:10 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1188817570.271073.170320@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>
References: <1188809249.040351.100160@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
   <ugRCi.65643$ax1.21591@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
   <46dbe4ac$0$3196$39db0f71@news.song.fi>
   <1188817116.418473.63040@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
   <1188817470.2630.28.camel@kartoffel.vocalweb.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.138.8.190
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1188817570 13051 127.0.0.1 (3 Sep 2007 11:06:10
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:06:10 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1188817470.2630.28.camel@kartoffel.vocalweb.de>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
 .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.138.8.190;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:1680
Date: 2007-09-03T04:06:10-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sep 3, 2:04 pm, Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh+bauh...@maps.futureapps.de>
wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 03:58 -0700, shoshanis...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I understood the generics, but I was looking to make a generic
> > function that receives an unknown procedure as a parameter, and runs
> > the procedure.
> > It's not like the 'regular' samples of " with function ">"(... "
> > I was wondering if there is a chance of creating a generic function
> > that receives an annonymous procedure.
>
> Is anything known about the parameter profile of the procedure?

simple empty procedure without any input parameters.