From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ebdc5ed511896a0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!82.197.223.104.MISMATCH!feeder4.cambrium.nl!feeder2.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.87.MISMATCH!news.astraweb.com!border2.a.newsrouter.astraweb.com!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.freenet.de!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer1.kpn.DE!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: urgent question - generics
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
In-Reply-To: <1188817116.418473.63040@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
References: <1188809249.040351.100160@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
	 <ugRCi.65643$ax1.21591@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
	 <46dbe4ac$0$3196$39db0f71@news.song.fi>
	 <1188817116.418473.63040@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1188817470.2630.28.camel@kartoffel.vocalweb.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 13:04:31 +0200
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 03 Sep 2007 13:03:52 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 7aedb0f4.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=Q=R3OWg8aO:L2C_`koXfC5ic==]BZ:af>4Fo<]lROoR14nDHegD_]R5[i[LXVb61[0N[W<lHX`=B4\6BhD5G6\i<;V:YC2YMLj1
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:1679
Date: 2007-09-03T13:03:52+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 03:58 -0700, shoshanister@gmail.com wrote:

> I understood the generics, but I was looking to make a generic
> function that receives an unknown procedure as a parameter, and runs
> the procedure.
> It's not like the 'regular' samples of " with function ">"(... "
> I was wondering if there is a chance of creating a generic function
> that receives an annonymous procedure.

Is anything known about the parameter profile of the procedure?