From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,42795ada22dedd1b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: malaise@magic.fr
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Legal usage of downward closures
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 03:52:39 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1188211959.321967.187440@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
References: <1187280678.505830.294720@a39g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
   <1187284110.812863.280360@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.54.144.229
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1188211959 409 127.0.0.1 (27 Aug 2007 10:52:39
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:52:39 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1187284110.812863.280360@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr;
 rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070725 Firefox/2.0.0.6,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 webshield4.thalesgroup.com
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.54.144.229;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:1567
Date: 2007-08-27T03:52:39-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 16 ao=FBt, 19:08, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
> On Aug 16, 9:11 am, mala...@magic.fr wrote:
>
> The assignment statements are illegal.  Every "anonymous access type"
> definition defines its own type; therefore Acc1 and Arg don't have the
> same type, and neither of those types is the same as Acc2_Type.  GNAT
> has a bug if it accepts them.
>
> Furthermore, this would be illegal due to accessibility level rules:
>
>     Acc2 :=3D Acc_Type(Arg);
>

Thank you.
This confirms my initial understanding.
I have reported the problem to ACT.

Regards