From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c3d0e99376a4f379
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer1.kpn.DE!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: History of Ada - and about the NYU DOS version
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
In-Reply-To: <kHAzi.457562$p47.69518@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
References: <1187235764.909133.180650@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
	 <UmWwi.38340$ax1.23060@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
	 <46c49e6e$1_6@news.bluewin.ch>
	 <rI9xi.40141$ax1.20593@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
	 <46c56070$1_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net>
	 <Qkrxi.438601$p47.325792@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
	 <46c9516a$1_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net>
	 <Dcryi.18691$eY.1026@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>
	 <46ca9b4e$1_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net>
	 <4mRyi.48124$ax1.20564@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
	 <46cd6ac8$1_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net> <46ce0146$1_5@news.bluewin.ch>
	 <kHAzi.457562$p47.69518@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1187972755.29852.58.camel@kartoffel>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:25:55 +0200
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Aug 2007 18:25:37 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4ec29cb8.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=a<40CD[UiHJlU`@c^jLCbJA9EHlD;3YcB4Fo<]lROoRA<`=YMgDjhgBXbjaGECgZ8G=kbmW`a1fGGC`2T@AUZfCK1O?mbNSP6lH
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:1546
Date: 2007-08-24T18:25:37+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 13:04 +0000, anon wrote:
>  The DOD decided 
> to use more cheaper versions of computer languages, such as C. 

Do you happen to have a pointer to further information about
a DoD decision to switch to cheap languages such as C? Fine
if it is only published in print, or on the web, or by the
government, by the DoD, on old CD-ROMs (of which I own a few),
wherever.

TIA,
-- Georg