From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ace3fca092a457cd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => Compiler
 Error
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:23:12 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1185981792.308225.281790@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
References: <KYtri.46105$Fc.35820@attbi_s21>
   <h%Bri.384485$p47.369566@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
   <KdCri.384503$p47.38112@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
   <wccbqdsk40u.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
   <x5gt38t82erv.18bpz9z12rz3q.dlg@40tude.net>
   <wccy7gwa7sh.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
   <1185901323.18398.4.camel@kartoffel>
   <1185909474.208950.99070@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
   <1185952601.476211.72590@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1185981794 30765 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2007 15:23:14
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:23:14 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1185952601.476211.72590@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
 rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922 Fedora/1.7.12-1.3.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:1323
Date: 2007-08-01T08:23:12-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Aug 1, 12:16 am, Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homep...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 31 Lip, 21:17, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
>
> > What I can't figure out is, my C compiler accepts "c = a+++b"
>
> Yes.
>
> > but it
> > doesn't
> > seem to accept "c = a+++++b"
>
> Right.
>
> > which should clearly be equivalent to
> > c = (a++) + (++b).
>
> Why do you think so? On what basis?

Sorry, I guess I should have used a smiley.  I thought it was obvious
that I was being silly.

                        -- Adam