From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ace3fca092a457cd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => Compiler
 Error
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:13:57 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1185927237.362545.195380@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
References: <KYtri.46105$Fc.35820@attbi_s21>
   <h%Bri.384485$p47.369566@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
   <KdCri.384503$p47.38112@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
   <AuPri.12685$ax1.5189@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1185927237 4741 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2007 00:13:57
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 00:13:57 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <AuPri.12685$ax1.5189@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
 rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922 Fedora/1.7.12-1.3.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:1303
Date: 2007-07-31T17:13:57-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Jul 31, 4:22 pm, a...@anon.org (anon) wrote:

> Ada LRM 4.4 ( 6 ) =>   factor ::= primary
>
>   +Right
>   -7
>
> Ada LRM 4.4 ( 7 ) =>   primary ::= numeric_literal | .. | (expression)
>
>   +Right  => is defined as an expression
>   -7      => is defined as an expression

What happened to those nice parentheses around "expression" that the
above syntax rule requires?  Did you think they were there in the RM
just for decoration?

No wonder you won't post using your real name.

                      -- Adam