From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,71b4c0131a8a22a4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!c77g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Harald Korneliussen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Corrected version Re: pragma License ? Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 23:30:41 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1182493841.177772.314860@c77g2000hse.googlegroups.com> References: <1182160706.208857@xnews001> NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.184.192.82 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1182493841 25547 127.0.0.1 (22 Jun 2007 06:30:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 06:30:41 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070515 Firefox/2.0.0.4,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: c77g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=213.184.192.82; posting-account=5vUApw0AAADF5Kx_4-L9ZPdL9lZywYoQ Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16292 Date: 2007-06-21T23:30:41-07:00 List-Id: anon wrote: > Also Linux was first written under Linus own license then moved to > GPL because it did not allow commercial redistribution. So Linus could > go back and write a new Linux license. > > E N O U G H S A I D A B O U T T H I S ! ! ! Sorry, can't let blatant misinformation like that stand. It concerns Ada insofar GNAT & GPL is so widespread and important. By now, Linus alone does not hold copyright to the entire kernel. I believe some contributors assign their rights to him, but some keep it, and many assign it to the Free Software Foundation instead (there are many kernel contributors to the "left" of Linus on free software issues). The FSF would never agree to a license change, except to GPL3. GPL2 does not force you to upgrade to GPL3 but it permits it ("at your option, any later version"). This means anyone is free to ship the entire kernel under GPL3, although you could still get it under the old licence from Linus and others. However, if a party redistributes or modifies a GPL3-version of the source, rather than a GPL2-version, perhaps by accident, they will be in trouble, if you think that limited opportunity to sue your users for software patent infringement is trouble.