From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b3f788f59498d3af
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Exceptions and out procedure arguments (using GNAT GPL)
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
In-Reply-To: <1o6rnwgzezcr2$.mv31ct5mmmso$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <79c673pq5htg508nkoi935n3udqg5ps7r8@4ax.com>
	 <1182181497.595409.300500@a26g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
	 <drle731ukcmhlt5km966imoudr5s92napd@4ax.com>
	 <1182238493.512406.168820@o61g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
	 <1182266486.650797.262430@a26g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
	 <u1ofbjnyd74k$.9604oalmbm4q$.dlg@40tude.net>
	 <4678c6a0$0$23135$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
	 <1o6rnwgzezcr2$.mv31ct5mmmso$.dlg@40tude.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1182329193.7759.30.camel@kartoffel>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:46:33 +0200
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Jun 2007 10:46:30 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67737fb1.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=K1113F:4U>S=>bdbdS?M0YA9EHlD;3YcR4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[Yl;ZbJ?bd7Q=kbmW`a1fGWC`2T@AUZfC[KZVC6@Co6B\
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16259
Date: 2007-06-20T10:46:30+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 10:02 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:21:16 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote:

> > Including unititialised in-variables? Partially initialised records?
> 
> OK, clearly this applies only to the things the subprogram is responsible
> for.
> 
> > And can you document all side effects on by reference (or global)
> > variables at all, in the presence of exceptions?
> 
> That depends on the meaning of "all." Certainly, we cannot control
> side-effects on the CPU's cache or on the green gas emission caused by
> consuming electricity during subprogram execution...

Yes, no need repeating the absurd. So what is the meaning of "all
side effects"?