From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,632dbd0caea19836
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: System calls - GNAT library vs. direct bindings
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 23:27:14 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1180679234.663392.52720@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
References: <1180623520.303981.191090@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <m2ira8lpt5.fsf@mac.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.138.37.241
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1180679234 13626 127.0.0.1 (1 Jun 2007 06:27:14
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 06:27:14 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <m2ira8lpt5.fsf@mac.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070228 Red Hat/1.5.0.10-0.1.slc3
 Firefox/1.5.0.10,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.138.37.241;
   posting-account=Ch8E9Q0AAAA7lJxCsphg7hBNIsMsP4AE
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16010
Date: 2007-05-31T23:27:14-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 31 Maj, 22:07, Simon Wright <simon.j.wri...@mac.com> wrote:

> We decided that GNAT.Sockets was perfectly OK for our needs (that
> doesn't mean we think it's perfect)

Why is it not perfect?

--
Maciej Sobczak
http://www.msobczak.com/