From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e2e62e83a203a6bc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: is it safe do adopt CORBA? From: Georg Bauhaus In-Reply-To: <1179508767.168693.47420@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> References: <1179508767.168693.47420@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: # Message-Id: <1179510755.27551.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 19:52:35 +0200 NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 May 2007 19:52:35 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 383c1166.newsspool3.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=lgkBJOckWO`_0Po7BmQ3]lMcF=Q^Z^V3h4Fo<]lROoRaFl8W>\BH3YbIA4NKS@Xg6`A:ho7QcPOVcTL@WTQV On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 10:19 -0700, marcelo.batera@gmail.com wrote: > Some of those articles even say CORBA is dead and claims SOAP is a > better replacement, sometimes giving some techinical "advantages" of > SOAP over CORBA. For sure, CORBA wasn't intended to be a quick and dirty CGI successor. I think that SOAP is better in _this_ regard. > Also, we need efficiency (something SOAP doesn't > give us) and the possibility to interact with other languages (such as > Java) over the network (something annex e doesn't provide us) and even > the integration with the user's desktop (gnome uses intensively CORBA > in it's very core) is very tempting. Have you considered evaluating PolyORB? https://libre.adacore.com/polyorb/ J2EE literature says that CORBA is too low level. OTOH, I understand you want to make specialized business software?