From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,91d0d8cd28bbb477 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e51g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Lucretia Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Implementing an Ada compiler and libraries. Date: 9 May 2007 20:39:02 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1178768342.556349.111890@e51g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> References: <1178721451.073700.10730@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <464239b2_4@news.bluewin.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.56.81.180 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1178768342 2635 127.0.0.1 (10 May 2007 03:39:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 03:39:02 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <464239b2_4@news.bluewin.ch> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.10 (X11; Linux i686; U; en),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: e51g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=62.56.81.180; posting-account=G-J9fgwAAADgpzBiEyy5tO4f8MX5fbpw Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15701 Date: 2007-05-09T20:39:02-07:00 List-Id: On May 9, 10:15 pm, Gautier wrote: > Hello, > > You seem to look for a model where each unit compilation ands into a file that > contains, roughly, the following information (with overlaps): > - the specification, "digested" > - the contents of the .ali file > - unit dependencies > - time stamps to check need of recompilations > - the compiled code (the .o object file itself). > > This model exists and works fine (esp., less files and a way faster > compilation!), it is the one of Turbo Pascal's .TPU files (~1988...) and its > descendants (TPW, Delphi). You just have to take a close look at it. No need > to reinvent anything... I'd forgotted about this. Do you have any pointers? Thanks, Luke.