From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,91d0d8cd28bbb477
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Lucretia <lucretia9@lycos.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Implementing an Ada compiler and libraries.
Date: 9 May 2007 20:38:27 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1178768307.012381.140530@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
References: <1178721451.073700.10730@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
   <wccfy65n2pq.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.56.81.180
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1178768307 2576 127.0.0.1 (10 May 2007 03:38:27
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 03:38:27 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <wccfy65n2pq.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.10 (X11; Linux i686; U; en),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=62.56.81.180;
   posting-account=G-J9fgwAAADgpzBiEyy5tO4f8MX5fbpw
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15700
Date: 2007-05-09T20:38:27-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On May 9, 9:48 pm, Robert A Duff <bobd...@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote:
> Presumably by storing information (symbol tables and whatnot) in
> permanent disk files.  If you do that, I think you should design it as a
> _pure_ optimization.  That is, the system should behave exactly as if
> everything is compiled from source every time, except that it's faster.
> Don't mimic the Ada 83 compilers that had a notion of "compiling things
> into the library", where a source file sitting right there in the source
> directory is ignored, unless "compiled into...".

Yes, I have no intention of having to add stuff to the library before
it can compile. I'm looking at a hybrid of what GNAT does combined
with the ability to use precompiled units in binary form.

> If you do this, you need to design a permanent (on disk) representation
> that is small.  I think it's possible, but it's not easy -- the
> "obvious" representation of symbol tables will be 10 times larger than
> the source code.  If it's 10 times larger, then it defeats the purpose
> -- reading it in from disk will be slower than re-analyzing the original
> source code.
>
> You also suggested storing the info in the object files.  Yes, that is
> possible, given a reasonable object file format that allows arbitrary
> information to be stored, in addition to the actual machine code.

DWARF?

> Building a complete Ada implementation is a daunting task (many
> person-years).  You said you're doing a subset of Ada 2005, and I assume
> you're doing this "just for fun".  Keep your subset small, or you will
> never finish.

Nope, just a subset.

Luke.