From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,34c5e4948f429691
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: vgodunko@rostel.ru
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ANN: QtAda preview available
Date: 6 May 2007 10:18:29 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1178471909.009690.57720@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
References: <1176378179.964724.176000@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
   <1201303.5dLqL8CvEh@linux1.krischik.com>
   <1176699587.727008.107400@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <46232421$1@news.post.ch>
   <1176738035.8013.15.camel@localhost>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.221.193.210
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1178471909 20516 127.0.0.1 (6 May 2007 17:18:29
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 17:18:29 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1176738035.8013.15.camel@localhost>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060914 SeaMonkey/1.0.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.221.193.210;
   posting-account=375N4Q0AAAAzUuvO_GtQ1y4GcAOan41q
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15600
Date: 2007-05-06T10:18:29-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Apr 16, 7:40 pm, Georg Bauhaus <bauh...@futureapps.de> wrote:
> Some of the issues
> seem to be caused by heavy use of 2005 style access together
> with type conversions of .all objects. Is this by necessity,
> or is it more like a consequence of translating C++ style
> references into Ada access parameters? (Maybe then the binding
> can profit from cont T& correspond to just "in", not "access
> not null"?)
Such type conversions not related to argument passing conventions, its
a part of bindings architecture. It is possible to replace anonymous
access types and avoid conversions of .all objects, but this will
require to declare too many named access types.