From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,1a52c822fc0dbb23 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!213.200.89.82.MISMATCH!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Rational for not making cursor tagged in Containers From: Georg Bauhaus In-Reply-To: <1q5s2gqbzhatf$.2xu8gdz4hxm8$.dlg@40tude.net> References: <1176998738.656903.141250@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1177010938.200523.325290@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1a8y2vakorfhx.225uqh4hifpd$.dlg@40tude.net> <1xmzi7newnilp.23m3zze8h9yi.dlg@40tude.net> <1177066583.5876.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1177080147.5876.87.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1q1kx2jlcvnuj.ck0711mj4few$.dlg@40tude.net> <15dj4pbkifj9c$.1g4y21vyx4j4d$.dlg@40tude.net> <1q5s2gqbzhatf$.2xu8gdz4hxm8$.dlg@40tude.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1177405128.6354.6.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:58:48 +0200 Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Apr 2007 10:53:21 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: ef090fac.newsspool1.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=ejD?oeM<31L0YVY]kmLTlDic==]BZ:afN4Fo<]lROoRAFl8W>\BH3YB;nL1onGoUSIN[W On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 10:38 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > 'Class is a difficult case. And a general question regarding it is, should > it be possible to have it "hyper-dispatching"? [sorry, for inventing new > terms on the fly]? I mean T'Class'Class. I'm dense, is there any difference between T'Class and T'Class'Class? When I assume Ada 95, and then T'Class ~ The tree of types rooted at T T'Class'Class ~ The tree of types rooted at T'Class --- T'Class'Class ~ The tree of types rooted at the tree of types rooted at T Isn't this the same set when it comes to actually performing some operation?