From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1a52c822fc0dbb23
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Rational for not making cursor tagged in Containers
Date: 20 Apr 2007 06:23:02 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1177075382.262926.247740@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
References: <1176998738.656903.141250@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <wccodlkz0ej.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
   <1177010938.200523.325290@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <wccodlkdrf3.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
   <1a8y2vakorfhx.225uqh4hifpd$.dlg@40tude.net>
   <1177031884.096796.106370@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
   <1v9a0f.p9c.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.232.240.198
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1177075382 10340 127.0.0.1 (20 Apr 2007 13:23:02
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:23:02 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1v9a0f.p9c.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
 InfoPath.2),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.232.240.198;
   posting-account=JVr7Xg0AAAAI3MbuARxMmvWLmA7qdJMx
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15148
Date: 2007-04-20T06:23:02-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Apr 20, 4:59 am, Jean-Pierre Rosen <r...@adalog.fr> wrote:
> Anh Vo a =E9crit :> I do not understand what other confusions do you refe=
r to. Other
> > advantage of prefix notation is that I do not have to fully qualify
> > nor apply use clause.
>
> And one advantage of use clause is that you don't have to use prefix
> notation ;-)

It is true. However, using use clause does not fit advantage category.
In addition, the side effect of using use clause, for most cases,
leans toward disadvantage side :-(

AV