From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,93a8020cc980d113
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!217.73.144.44.MISMATCH!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.albasani.net!feeder06.uucp-net.de!news.uucp.at!uucp.gnuu.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What is wrong with Ada?
From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
In-Reply-To: <46249099.4080408@obry.net>
References: <1176150704.130880.248080@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
	 <zyBSh.44138$oV.14776@attbi_s21> <461B52A6.20102@obry.net>
	 <awirc4gv13.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <461BA892.3090002@obry.net>
	 <yeabxgnsrj.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <82dgve.spf.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
	 <1176226291.589741.257600@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
	 <4eaive.6p9.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <sa4ps6apjb7.fsf@margay.local>
	 <1176396382.586729.195490@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
	 <n3r6qpea4p.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <f00106$tqm$1@f04n12.cac.psu.edu>
	 <c98xcs8jao.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>  <46249099.4080408@obry.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1176804270.10806.13.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:04:31 +0200
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Apr 2007 11:59:24 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 892d29f5.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=d`7[XV_05_6LNKYb?b>0764IUK<Cl32<14Fo<]lROoR14nDHegD_]R5XB4V41WV948N[W<lHX`=B4\6BhD5G6\i<HIOKhB_N56<
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15077
Date: 2007-04-17T11:59:24+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 11:17 +0200, Pascal Obry wrote:
>  2 developers on 2 projects for one year... why not 2
> developers on 1 project for 6 months, and then on the second project...
> 
> I bet that the total time will be inferior to one year as many errors
> will probably be caught by this second pair of eyes on the project. Is
> there some studies in this direction ? What are the conclusions ?

That would be pair programming,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_programming

(Pair programming has better results when the pair differs
in views, I think.)