From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,93a8020cc980d113
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Adam Beneschan" <adam@irvine.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What is wrong with Ada?
Date: 13 Apr 2007 09:25:23 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1176481523.715101.274360@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
References: <1176150704.130880.248080@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
   <zyBSh.44138$oV.14776@attbi_s21>
   <461B52A6.20102@obry.net>
   <zvOSh.45388$oV.18561@attbi_s21>
   <krrspgzz88g4$.15lzsnhxml4j.dlg@40tude.net>
   <1176332730.826176.286450@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
   <Xns991044830E503pchapinsovernet@198.186.192.137>
   <21veg1agmb.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
   <1176461204.074168.84880@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1176481524 4992 127.0.0.1 (13 Apr 2007 16:25:24
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:25:24 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1176461204.074168.84880@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
 rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922 Fedora/1.7.12-1.3.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122;
   posting-account=cw1zeQwAAABOY2vF_g6V_9cdsyY_wV9w
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14985
Date: 2007-04-13T09:25:23-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Apr 13, 3:46 am, "Harald Korneliussen" <vinterm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Apr 12, 3:04 pm, Markus E Leypold
>
> > laws. I.e. there is the whole issue of stabdardization and how to use
> > standards properly.
>
> That was a very interesting typo, actually.

It's even more interesting if you rearrange the first four letters a
bit.

                                     -- Adam