From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d3287d5ba796ff88
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Ludovic Brenta" <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT documentation in Debian
Date: 10 Apr 2007 08:12:34 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1176217954.620599.9530@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
References: <ev5sbg$26k$1@online.de><xzlkh5xluv.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
   <871wivf1l8.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
   <87ps6ce1ie.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.58.34.227
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1176217954 2494 127.0.0.1 (10 Apr 2007 15:12:34
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:12:34 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <87ps6ce1ie.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 SEVPXS01
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=32.58.34.227;
   posting-account=ZjNXewwAAADyBPkwI57_UcX8yKfXWOss
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14867
Date: 2007-04-10T08:12:34-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Apr 10, 4:40 pm, Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
> * Ludovic Brenta:
>
> > None of the GCC maintainers (including myself) having sufficient time,
> > energy or interest to produce the non-free doc packages, Nikita
> > V. Youshchenko took it upon himself.  Unfortunately, he lacked the
> > time, energy or interest to include the Ada docs.  You are welcome to
> > file a wishlist bug against the source package `gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg',
> > or contribute the necessary patches yourself.
>
> Aren't the GNAT manuals suitable for main?  The boilerplate reads:
>
> @copying
> Copyright @copyright{} 1995-2005, Free Software Foundation
>
> Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
> under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2
> or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
> with the Invariant Sections being ``GNU Free Documentation License'', with the
> Front-Cover Texts being
> ``@value{EDITION} User's Guide'',
> and with no Back-Cover Texts.
> A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
> ``GNU Free Documentation License''.
> @end copying
>
> I can ask upstream to remove the GFDL from the Invariant Sections
> list.  Technically, this is a no-op anyway.

That would be nice. Please do and see what happens.

(technically this would require creating a new gnat-4.1-doc source
package, or re-include the docs in the gcc-4.1 source package.)

--
Ludovic Brenta.