From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,93a8020cc980d113,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "martinbishop" <jedibebop@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: What is wrong with Ada?
Date: 9 Apr 2007 13:31:44 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1176150704.130880.248080@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.222.54.234
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1176150704 3953 127.0.0.1 (9 Apr 2007 20:31:44
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:31:44 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20061201 Firefox/2.0.0.3
 (Ubuntu-feisty),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.222.54.234;
   posting-account=Ywr2kg0AAACnFl99Gc_5GryIu34_sHvp
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14849
Date: 2007-04-09T13:31:44-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I've never been scared of "non mainstream" languages, but I was
wondering, what is wrong with Ada?  Why don't more people use it?
What
do most people think of it?  To me, it seems like a nice, concise, and
safe language, but I haven't used it yet.