From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,427e29f23a651ddb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!cw-insnet-peer-00!storethat.news.telefonica.de!telefonica.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Finding out minimal allocation unit From: Georg Bauhaus In-Reply-To: <20070403144350.6c95e085@cube.tz.axivion.com> References: <20070403144350.6c95e085@cube.tz.axivion.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1175606570.4684.11.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:22:51 +0200 Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 03 Apr 2007 15:18:18 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 8aed6a26.newsspool3.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=EcK\7\BH3YRBSV>HSU^VI\N[W On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 14:43 +0200, Stefan Bellon wrote: > Is there a reliable way of finding out the smallest allocation unit? FWIW, type LP is -- new ... with record forward: access LP; backward: access LP; end record; for LP'Size use 63; should make the compiler complain when 63 bits aren't enough.