From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fc52c633190162e0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Ludovic Brenta" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Erasing inappropriate operations (was: why learn C?) Date: 3 Apr 2007 05:42:09 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1175604129.583861.40720@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> References: <1172144043.746296.44680@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1172161751.573558.24140@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <546qkhF1tr7dtU1@mid.individual.net> <5ZULh.48$YL5.40@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net> <1175215906.645110.217810@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <1175230700.925143.28490@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1btkgzzj6zimp.acsq8mkzqz1w$.dlg@40tude.net> <1175488143.324741.283480@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <1lxqyx4ognsed$.ait5qqwujfo8$.dlg@40tude.net> <1175501959.751535.23190@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.58.34.227 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1175604131 12476 127.0.0.1 (3 Apr 2007 12:42:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 12:42:11 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 SEVPXS01 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=32.58.34.227; posting-account=ZjNXewwAAADyBPkwI57_UcX8yKfXWOss Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14759 Date: 2007-04-03T05:42:09-07:00 List-Id: Randy Brukardt: > the Amendment fixed the most important problem in Ada 95: > the inability to "erase" an inappropriate operation from a unit type > package. Could you please explain what you mean by this? A quick perusal of the Ada 2005 rationale failed to enlighten me. -- Ludovic Brenta.