From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b2923d60cb81694b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "frikk" <frikker@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Unsigned Integer Restraint Errors
Date: 13 Mar 2007 05:09:50 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1173787790.826099.287610@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>
References: <1173712032.183064.264340@8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com>
   <e9in1ny6b3gb.16e7shcfhyja8$.dlg@40tude.net>
   <1173726806.656979.305660@8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com>
   <et4cma$o0v$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
   <BFoJh.14542$PF.8157@attbi_s21>
   <et57ho$bjm$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.129.98.129
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1173787794 25955 127.0.0.1 (13 Mar 2007 12:09:54
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:09:54 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <et57ho$bjm$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
 InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 TRY0PX01
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.129.98.129;
   posting-account=192wHg0AAAAzciSzoZsEBI9bw5pVCopO
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14508
Date: 2007-03-13T05:09:50-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mar 12, 11:00 pm, "Randy Brukardt" <r...@rrsoftware.com> wrote:
> "Jeffrey R. Carter" <jrcar...@acm.org> wrote in messagenews:BFoJh.14542$PF.8157@attbi_s21...
>
[...]
> (*) ISO published the Amendment on March 9th. So Ada 95 is now
> obsolete...and "Ada" includes the Amendment.

Thank you everyone for the responses. To clear things up - I am really
only using the 64 bit unsigned integers since it is defined in my
project spec as a requirement. This is more of an acedemic program,
not so much for practical use. I'm counting the number of 'on' bits in
any 64 bit unsigned integer and returning if there is a prime number
of them or not, as part of the requirement.

I've used the suggestions you guys have had and now have it working
the way I'd like.  Thanks again, you guys are always very helpful!

Thanks,
Blaine