From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e81fd3a32a1cacd2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.motzarella.org!news.swapon.de!news.musoftware.de!news.weisnix.org!newsfeed.ision.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!ision!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Does Ada tasking profit from multi-core cpus? From: Georg Bauhaus In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1173192250.11841.72.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:44:10 +0100 Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 06 Mar 2007 15:41:05 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 90b6cd9e.newsspool3.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=:fRTH[gKj\EFJ3]dH>I?oEMcF=Q^Z^V3H4Fo<]lROoRAFl8W>\BH3YBAVLJ=JR`DSKN[WfPble On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 09:40 +0000, Colin Paul Gloster wrote: > I am grateful to Thomas Moran for such a brilliant demonstration of > how poor the so-called GNU Ada Translator can be. I'm sure they welcome rich suggestions. IIRC, Stephen Leake wanted to ask why GNAT is asking NT for a semaphore for protected functions. Any news, Stehpen? -- Georg