From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e219d94b946dfc26
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Hyman Rosen" <hyman.rosen@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada.Command_Line and wildcards
Date: 26 Feb 2007 09:11:53 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1172509912.655684.114870@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>
References: <45dcaed8_6@news.bluewin.ch>
   <C2026327.9876A%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
   <1172132169.423514.271890@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>
   <n7ujre.f7n.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
   <wcc1wkhlln0.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
   <eG$DqrDiEBCi@eisner.encompasserve.org>
   <wcclkinz7d3.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
   <r1aEh.1658$N63.691@trnddc08>
   <wccmz32bf7b.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
   <45E1B7AA.30804@obry.net>
   <1dpvltpykld8r$.1rn2ewhc0itjt$.dlg@40tude.net>
   <yStEh.6202$iF.2036@trndny03>
   <1s55dlqncctpm$.zs9aloiw8j2l$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.248.208
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1172509930 21660 127.0.0.1 (26 Feb 2007 17:12:10
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:12:10 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1s55dlqncctpm$.zs9aloiw8j2l$.dlg@40tude.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2;
 .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com; posting-host=204.253.248.208;
   posting-account=lJDDWg0AAACmMd7wLM4osx8JUCDw_C_j
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:9554
Date: 2007-02-26T09:11:53-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Feb 26, 3:44 am, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
wrote:
> Further, why do you presume that heap is larger than stack?
> AFAIK, nothing in RM requires or implies that.

Past experience. If that's not the case for some implementation then
fine, but I suspect it's more often the case then not. I'm pretty sure
we've seen newbie examples on the newsgroup where they create
unconstrained objects (is that the right term?) on the stack and then
wonder why their program doesn't work.