From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b863ca48c5b37b7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Anh Vo" <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: My bug or compiler bug?
Date: 14 Feb 2007 18:22:55 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1171506175.522233.313670@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <1171486682.699549.276940@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1171500284.2394.26.camel@localhost>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.232.218.24
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1171506181 28452 127.0.0.1 (15 Feb 2007 02:23:01
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:23:01 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1171500284.2394.26.camel@localhost>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
 Windows NT 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.232.218.24;
   posting-account=JVr7Xg0AAAAI3MbuARxMmvWLmA7qdJMx
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:9333
Date: 2007-02-14T18:22:55-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Feb 14, 4:44 pm, Georg Bauhaus <bauh...@arcor.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 12:58 -0800, Anh Vo wrote:
> > I could not understand why it, line 44 of the code below, compiles. I
> > strugged with the question why actual parameter R'(10.0, 20.0) matches
> > with access type parameter R_Pointer at line 15. Is it my bug or
> > compiler bug? Thanks.
>
> >    for R_Pointer'Write use Write_R_Pointer;
>
> >       R'Write (File_Stream, R'(10.0, 20.0)); --# Why is OK while data
> > mismached
>
> I think R'Write is just the standard 'Write, expecting
> record components as usual. (Unlike R_Pointer'Write)
>
>  -- Georg

Thank you very much for pointing it. For some reason, may be after
6:00 PM syndrome, I was thinking R_Pointer'Write instead of R'Write.
AV