From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,21960280f1d61e84
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!keepthis.news.telefonica.de!telefonica.de!news.cs.univ-paris8.fr!proxad.net!proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How come Ada isn't more popular?
From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@arcor.de>
In-Reply-To: <66tzxy44ou.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
References: <1169636785.504223.139630@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>
	 <SJudnfsXuZsDLyrYnZ2dnUVZ_t6qnZ2d@comcast.com> <45b8361a_5@news.bluewin.ch>
	 <m7ejpj5u9t.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <u7iv8o16m.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
	 <3pejpgfbki.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <epkcru$fk2$1@cernne03.cern.ch>
	 <njirepncb0.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <eppn6r$m41$1@cernne03.cern.ch>
	 <vwbqkffq94.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <eputhf$p8u$1@cernne03.cern.ch>
	 <dzsldoachu.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <eq6v5b$bsb$1@cernne03.cern.ch>
	 <l5iregra8a.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <eq9gv3$dre$1@cernne03.cern.ch>
	 <il64aftsq7.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <eqa2j8$mfu$1@cernne03.cern.ch>
	 <bpveifcmum.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <eqc456$fp5$1@cernne03.cern.ch>
	 <66tzxy44ou.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: #
Message-ID: <1170889136.30084.86.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 23:58:56 +0100
NNTP-Posting-Date: 07 Feb 2007 23:57:59 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 171b95fa.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=WZ_lhj9TRff<6cDJZfMd_cic==]BZ:afn4Fo<]lROoRa^YC2XCjHcbiUn@TI_aiEnbN[W<lHX`=Bd\6BhD5G6\il^LWib6\nI>m
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:9112
Date: 2007-02-07T23:57:59+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 11:56 +0100, Markus E Leypold wrote:
> Maciej Sobczak <no.spam@no.spam.com> writes:

> >> and as with
> >> George Bauhaus I simply refuse this kind of discussion (FUD and
> >> ContraFUD).
> >
> > OK. We will just stay unconvinced. :-)
> 
> :-) I think so. We just don't have a common basis to slug it out and
> come to a rational decision. Not surprising, give that Ada and C++ are
> still around AND the GCed languages are also living

My favorite Ada compiler produces GCing programs.


  -- Georg