From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b88c7b1a4db3246c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Ludovic Brenta" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Reference Manual in texinfo format? Date: 6 Feb 2007 01:00:59 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1170752459.890968.12150@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> References: <87sldpo83w.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <4dCdncquF5TP71_YnZ2dnUVZ_tOmnZ2d@megapath.net> <87odo9lhog.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <1170681175.011450.167450@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <0-adnRXpj9QKU1rYnZ2dnUVZ_t2tnZ2d@megapath.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.190.145.10 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1170752473 1691 127.0.0.1 (6 Feb 2007 09:01:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:01:13 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <0-adnRXpj9QKU1rYnZ2dnUVZ_t2tnZ2d@megapath.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 SEVPXS01 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com; posting-host=212.190.145.10; posting-account=ZjNXewwAAADyBPkwI57_UcX8yKfXWOss Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:9012 Date: 2007-02-06T01:00:59-08:00 List-Id: On Feb 6, 1:42 am, "Randy Brukardt" wrote: > "Ludovic Brenta" wrote in message > > news:1170681175.011450.167450@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > ... > > > It would be better if Randy granted you write access to the CVS > > repository. Randy, what do you think? > > That probably wouldn't be a good idea, for a number of reasons. The obvious > one is that the current Perl scripts only support read access (adding > something else would be, umm, interesting). But the main one is that the > primary purpose of that repository is managing the ACATS. I need to keep > very tight control over that (can't have tests appearing there or getting > modified without tracking them and announcing the changes with careful > version control). That's true for the RM source, too, don't want any > surprise modifications to it, either. Sounds reasonable. In that case, Stephe, you can host your scripts on Ada-France's monotone server if you like. Anything is better than email, IMHO :) If you'd like that, drop me a line. PS. Monotone has a nice feature called "trust". You can set up hooks that will filter revisions based on who committed them (or other arbitrary criteria), and make them invisible to "update" and other commands if you don't trust these committers. A trusted committer can then "approve" a revision to make it visible. What's nice about it is that the "trust" feature is outside the database, and can be set up differently in each working copy; the database always contains all revisions, and each user can choose which revisions to trust. -- Ludovic Brenta.