From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fb89149bff45fa40 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail From: mcneills@landcareresearch.co.nz (Stephen McNeill) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: gwindows as target from rapid Date: 2 Sep 2004 15:06:31 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <116a1020.0409021406.64897ff7@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.27.240.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1094162792 8638 127.0.0.1 (2 Sep 2004 22:06:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 22:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3278 Date: 2004-09-02T15:06:31-07:00 List-Id: Peter Hermann wrote in message news:... > Frank Piron wrote: > > > Is there a gwindows discussion group? > > > > Once there was a mailing list: gnavi-list@gnavi.org. > > But i don't know if there is a chance of getting a > > response. > > this mail-address does not ( or no more(?) ) exist. The email-address indeed doesn't exist. Some time ago there was some brief discussion about the future direction of Gwindows. Nothing came of that, so I wanted to know if Gwindows is something people are still interested in, or should we give it a decent burial? If it is still needed, perhaps we need to organise ourselves to be able to get the package to a state we're happy with. Regards Stephen