From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b20cdfabe042877c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-24 03:33:19 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: mcneills@landcareresearch.co.nz (Stephen McNeill) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Gwindows Development Team Date: 24 Apr 2004 03:33:19 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <116a1020.0404240233.41571243@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.135.62.249 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1082802799 19860 127.0.0.1 (24 Apr 2004 10:33:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 10:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7449 Date: 2004-04-24T03:33:19-07:00 List-Id: Frank Piron wrote in message news:... > Hi, > who would like to work in a new Gwindows > development team? > who would like to manage the sources > and coordinate work? There seems to have been a deafening silence on this issue, although Frank's note was posted onto the Gnavi list, and Craig Carey made a few comments. I feel that there are probably several people who would like to help, including myself, but I think it's quite difficult to take the coordination role on, given that GWindows was the effort of one person. Frank, can you give us an update on any feedback you've had on this issue from your postings? I think GWindows has been such a good working Windows model that it would be a shame to see it lose out on development, and there are some fine applications out there using it. I hope something can be worked out. Stephen